We thank the reviewers for their feedback. We will first respond to shared and then to individual comments. Additionally, reviewers 2 and 3 requested clarification regarding the advantages of DCA over other methods. For instance, one could attempt to correlate each neuron's contribution to the DCA subspace with single-neuron Studying the behavior of Kernel DCA is a direction for future studies. Additionally, we found and corrected a minor bug in Figure 1A: the SFA and DCA lines are now blue and red, respectively.

Do the main claims made in the abstract and introduction accurately reflect the paper's If you ran experiments... (a) Did you include the code, data, and instructions needed to reproduce the main experimental results (either in the supplemental material or as a URL)? [Y es] (b) Did you specify all the training details (e.g., data splits, hyperparameters, how they Did you report error bars (e.g., with respect to the random seed after running experiments multiple times)? Did you include the total amount of compute and the type of resources used (e.g., type Did you include any new assets either in the supplemental material or as a URL? [Y es] Did you discuss whether and how consent was obtained from people whose data you're If you used crowdsourcing or conducted research with human subjects... (a) Hyper-parameter V alues learning rate 0.0005, 0.0001 batch size 16, 32 " annealing period 20000, 10000 RNN hidden dimension 64, 32, 16 Table 2: Hyper-parameters of QMIX in the Tiger-Trampoline Experiment In Section 5.1, we show the results of MAPPO and QMIX on the Tiger-Trampoline game. In the Hanabi experiments, we implement IMPROVISED as follows (better viewed together with the pseudocode). Player 1 and player 2 do not share the random seed beforehand. We do not anticipate any immediate negative impact from this work.